Menu
| Sustainable product prototyping - Conclustion |
Page 6 of 6
Green
consumer survey
The
percentage of US customers who do not care about the environment (‘Basic
Browns’) has risen from 28% in 1990 to 37% in 1996, according to the Green
Gauge Report conducted by Roper Starch Worldwide, US. The percentage of
‘Greenback Greens’, who are willing to pay 20% more for environmentally sound
products has declined from 11% to 5%. Environmental factors are not as
important as product issues such as quality, price, brand and convenience of
purchase, etc. However, the US government is increasingly purchasing in an
environmentally sound manner, incorporating ‘green’ criteria in procurement.
Finally, nearly 75% of Americans think that they should take more positive
action towards the environment (the ‘guilt gap’) with recycling the only green
activity that has increased.
Sources: The
Hartman report, the Hartman Group, Bellevue, WA; American Demographics
Buying
recycled
In a new book
by Joel Makower, ‘10 Easy ways to buy recycled’ there are various examples of
products made out of waste or recycled materials. Makower states that ‘If
you’re not buying recycled products, you’re not really recycling’. Examples
include a doll made out of recycled soda bottles and organic cotton; key
chains, clipboards and magnets made out of used computer circuit boards;
wallets, backpacks and book covers out of recycled plastic bottle fibres and
coffee tables from bicycle inner tubes, chains and gears. Joel Makower is the
author of ‘The Green Consumer’ and editor of the ‘Green Business Letter’.
Source: Earth
Action Network, 1997, http://www.emagazine.com:80/0997gl_ consumer.html
Green glass
The German
company Seiler’s patented ‘high temperature vitrification technique’ – a
process which makes ceramic glass products out of steel mill dust, garnet blast
media residue and industrial wastewater treatment sludge was accepted by the
California Environmental Agency as a recycling technique. Since the process is
no longer considered a waste treatment process, Seiler can start marketing the
products for abrasives, roofing tile granules and architectural materials.
Source:
Business Wire news
New O2
contacts
O2 liaison Officers
were appointed recently in the Philippines, Mexico and India and will now
inform designers in their country about O2. Liaison Officers have already been
appointed in Japan, Germany and USA.
The
Netherlands Design Institute to coorperate with O2
The
Netherlands Design Institute (NDI) will cooperate with the O2 Global Network
and other organizations interested in creating the O2 Website. Any suggestions,
comments and contributions are welcome. In 1998, O2 will have its tenth
anniversary and O2 Netherlands its fifth.
O2 Japan was
launched in 1992 with an O2 exhibition in Seibu. This was followed by the
Tennen (‘Nature’) Design conference in 1995.
‘Tennen Design’
ecological design conference
Tennen Design,
the Japanese ecological design conference, highlighted that the Western problem
solving approach was insufficient for developing eco-design solutions if not
balanced with an approach that recognises ‘values’. Eco-designers try to find fixes
for product-related environmental problems, but in most cases this is an
incremental approach allowing for budget,time and constraints. A theme that
arose was ‘are we producing sustainable solutions or are we just going nowhere
fast’: doing good things, but possibly in the wrong direction? A suggestion
from the conference was that it is equally important to consider the ‘values’
that we strive for. It is important to consider the ‘value’ that the product
will attain for the customer in 15 or 30 years time and how this relates to
environment. Then the designer should consider how this should and will
influence his/her design now and in the future.
The Tennen Design
conference was held in the shintoist Honen In temple in Kyoto, the temple city
of Japan. Workshops had themes like ‘Design that will last 100 years’,
‘Ecological machines’ and ‘Information environment and design’.
Monks read
email
A parallel
conference was connected by email to Delft in the Netherlands. The concept was
to provide a comparative Western perspective on the ideas that developed at
Tennen Design. Monks from the Honen In temple and participants translated the
printouts of the East-West conversation for each other.
A green
laptop
Some of the
inevitable misunderstandings from the e-mail workshop actually led to new
ideas. For example, the question of whether a laptop computer could be made
green or more sustainable evolved from the workshop entitled ‘from symbiotic to
assimilated design’. This led to the concept of a vertical bath tub which the
user enters. Gestures in the fluid are transmitted to the other people by
movements in the fluid. The computer as an environment itself, in which you can
swim.
Conclusion
As with any
workshop, the concepts generated needed considerable prototyping. However, the
aim of the conference was to act as a catalyst for new thinking. As Misako
Yomosa, one of the organisers, puts it: ‘I think of the conference as an
initiation of continuing activities toward ecooriented society’.
The Tennen Design
Forum continues its work as a loose network.
More info:
http://www.johokyoto.or.jp/~tennen/
The Japanese designer
– interview with Fumi Masuda
Q: You have
worked with European and US designers. Would you say the situation of the
Japanese designers is similar?
A: Well, no.
The position of industrial designers in Japan is unusual. Over 90% of the whole
population of industrial designers in this country is employed by industry.
Independent industrial designers are minorities. Major manufacturing industries
such as Toyota Motor Co. or Matsushita Electric Co. have huge design centres
and each of them employ 200 to 500 industrial designers in-house. They always
work in collaboration with product planning, marketing and engineering groups
and are usually specialists in particular product areas like computers, Office
furniture and so on.
Q: Are they
technically-oriented or aesthetically-oriented designers?
A: Industrial
designers are generally recognized as having responsibilities in relation to
the forms and images of the products.
Q: What about
influencing product definition?
A: This is
hard to say, as most work for big companies. Some of them are acting as design
managers instead of being product design specialists.
Several designers
work as consultants for comparably small local companies and may have more influence.
Q: Would you
say Tennen Design had an average public?
A: Roughly
speaking, half of the designers at Tennen Design Forum ‘95 were independent designers
from Tokyo and the others were employed designers from the Kansai area (Kyoto
and Osaka).
Q: So what
else can we expect from Tennen Design?
A: Tennen Design
is a temporary group or a non-regular event which has happened twice (the workshop
in ’95 and an exhibition in ’96). The participants shared a very special time
and space before going back to their own life. Someone may organize another
Tennen Design sometime when he or she feels the awareness and attention is
running out. No goal, no strategy.
Q: Is O2 a
factor in Japan? It is European by origin and may still be rather European in
approach.
A: I always
respect the O2 way of thinking, which is very practical and realistic, in other
words, quite Western. I hope we could show our way of thinking from the Eastern
side. This is still difficult to explain to a Westerner. O2 is actually quite
well known among young Japanese industrial designers. Quite a few of them would
be interested in getting involved; the only barrier is the language problem.
Q: ‘What
about the man on the street? Does he or she bother about environmental
problems?’
A: Japanese
people are generally aware of, or at least understand, the importance of the
environmental issues. For many it is a deeply a cultural subject rather than a
technical matter. They have a long history of living symbiotically with nature.
But, I think they need some more time to remember how pleasant it used to be.
Recycling
developments in Japan
If you don’t
know how your products are going to be recycled, how can you ever design for
it?
Background
In Japan, 24
million air conditioners, television sets, refrigerators and washing machines
are bought annually. 14 million are thrown away per annum, which constitutes
620,000 tons of waste (over 1.2 % of household waste). To cope with the volume
of household waste (50 million tons a year, 124 million inhabitants), a legal
framework was set up in 1991. This will evolve into more specific and stricter
laws over the years. Officially called ‘law for the promotion of using recycled
resources’, the law is usually referred to as ‘the recycling law’. Therefore
smart thinking implies that larger consumer products should be designed for
recycling with consideration of ‘take back’ also included.
Pilot plant
Hitachi,
together with two government agencies, set up a home appliance recycling pilot
plant. To allow for effective separation of the materials, the connections,
form enclosures and surface layers need to be released (‘unlocked’). To achieve
this the pilot plant uses cryo
genics. Low
temperatures (-150 degree C for steel) make the materials so brittle that they
can be easily milled into small mono-material pieces. This is especially
relevant for complex components like motors and compressors, where materials
are closely intertwined. Even the paint comes off the steel. After the metals,
the somewhat ‘warmer’ nitrogen can still be used for unlocking plastics.
Plastics
A new
technique for plastics separation uses the temperature at which it becomes
brittle. After cooling and milling, materials with can simply be separated by
sieving. Only polyvinylchloride (PVC) is recycled, polyethylene (PE) is reduced
to oil and polystyrene (PS) is burnt.
Bottom line
At the facility,
recycling of refrigerators costs about ¥3500 (US$28), and recycling of
televisions and washing machines about ¥1100 (US$9). With this capacity (3000
ton/year), Tokyo alone would need 7 plants. Therefore, Hitachi, MITI,
Mitsubishi and Sony aim to build a plant with 4 times this capacity. •
Adapted from
Technieuws, issue 1, 1997, Dutch Department of Economical Affairs.
SimaPro
Details
PRé
Consultants B.V. Plotterweg 12 3821 BB Amersfoort The Netherlands Tel +31 (0)33
4555022 Fax +31 (0)33 4555024 http//www.pre.nl
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Review of
SimaPro 4.0
f you have ever had cause to consider Life
Cycle Assessment (LCA) software, you will almost certainly have come across
SimaPro. Since PRé Consultants released the very earliest version of SimaPro in
1990 it has led the field in terms of licence sales around the world. To date,
the MS-DOS based SimaPro 3.1 (SP3.1) still manages twice the market share of
its nearest rival. Now the next generation, SimaPro 4.0 (SP4.0), is due for
release.
Unlike SP3.1,
SimaPro 4.0 runs in the ubiquitous Windflows environment (Windflows 3.x, 95 and
NT4) and whilst retaining everything which has made the earlier SimaPros
successful, SP4.0 contains several new features, a revised and expanded
database structure and an array of different ways to manipulate data and
results.
Very simply,
SimaPro will analyse the environmental impacts of a product, or compare the
impacts of two or more products. It uses a modular system whereby you can
combine individual processes (i.e.materials, transport, industrial processing
and waste disposal options) from its central process database to make more
complex ones. Processes are then placed in assembly boxes representing complete
products. In this way, infinitely complex flflows of materials and processes
(process trees) can be built up and these are stored in a life-cycle box which
forms the top of the tree. The software can apply various weighting methods to
calculate the resulting environmental impacts for the whole life-cycle arising
from raw materials usage and substance emissions. These impacts are worked out
for any number of criteria such as ozone depletion, greenhouse effect, summer
smog, etc, and the results are presented in a detailed tabular or graphic form.
A typical
life-cycle box can contain several assemblies, details of the product’s use
phase, i.e.its working life, and its final disposal options. Disposal options
include disposal scenarios which allow you to direct waste units to final
disposal, recycling, or re-use; disassembly boxes, which let you describe how a
product might be broken up into its component parts for recycling or waste
disposal; and re-use boxes which describe the processes involved in supplying a
product for re-use.
Using the
program – creating a process tree
As with a
number of LCA programs, SimaPro 4.0 may appear a little overwhelming at first.
However, the guided tour in the accompanying user manual is certainly
comprehensive, and providing you take the time to follow it through from start
to finish, you should become familiar with most of its features fairly quickly.
The program is laid out in a logical manner, with separate tabbed pages for
each of the important components and once you have learned the basics, SimaPro
is remarkably straightforward and consistent, despite its complexity.
At the heart
of the software is the information contained in the process records detailing
materials, transport, industrial processes and waste disposal. Linking these
processes together to form a process tree is done by inserting the name and
amount of a ‘daughter process’ into the appropriate inputs from technosphere
part of a parent process’ record, or into an assembly box. The operation is
made very easy through the use of pop-up dialogue boxes containing processes
for you to select, and at any time you can switch to a tree diagram showing the
component parts of the current process or assembly you are constructing. Raw
materials and emissions for each process record are selected from a separate
substances database.
A very
helpful feature is that the software lets you enter amounts in process records
and assemblies using any scale you choose, as, for example, SimaPro is fully
aware that 0.001 tons is really 1000 grams. This reduces the time taken to add
data and probably increases data accuracy too! You can even define your own
unit conversions in case you want SimaPro to calculate in units it does not
initially recognise.
The structure
of process records has been designed to conform to the relevant sections of the
Society for the Promotion of Lifecycle Design (SPOLD) Common Format for
Lifecycle Inventory (LCI) Data. The SPOLD format is likely to become the
standard for LCA data and it makes good sense to include that standard in LCA
software, making it much easier for organizations to share information.
However, the SPOLD format is also somewhat unwieldy and asks that the user
enters large amounts of text which contributes nothing to actual calculations.
With this in mind, PRé have included the option to use, view, edit and add
records in a much abridged form, using essential data only. Unfortunately,
adopting an external data format has left no obvious place to include transport
processes in the new style records. Transport must now be entered under
energy/heat to conform with SPOLD, though it is categorised elsewhere in the
software as a distinct process type, quite separate from energy.
SimaPro 4.0
is supplied with over 930 process records using data by Delft University of
Technology, the Netherlands; PRé Consultants, and an officially licensed and
peer-reviewed version of the BUWAL 250, 1997 database.
You can add
your own processes to the database, import them from other SimaPro users, and
modify those supplied with the software to suite individual circumstances.
SP3.1 users can convert their databases for use in SP4.0.
Using the program
– calculating the impacts
Calculating
impacts from a ‘process tree’ can be done at almost any time – the model
certainly doesn’t need to be complete, though obviously the more complete your
model, the more complete your results. Clicking the analyse button will set
SimaPro calculating the inventory and the environmental impacts for a selected
process.
Graphic
display for characterisation stage of a product using the Eco-Indicator 95
evaluation method box. If you have more than one data object open, clicking the
compare button will calculate the inventories and impacts for all of these so
that the results can be viewed side by side.
SimaPro uses
various evaluation methods which will classify substances according to their
effects on environmental impacts such as acid rain and ozone depletion. PRé’s
much used Eco-Indicator 95 (included in the software) will:
• Show the
relative contributions of each calculated process to a list of environmental
effects (scaled to 100%); • Normalise these contributions to the effects of an
average European inhabitant over one year;
• Evaluate
the effects by applying a weighting factor to derive the overall seriousness of
the impacts with regard to human health and ecosystems;
• Aggregate
all impacts in the evaluation stage to arrive at a single figure for the
environmental impact of each material and process in the model.
SimaPro also
comes with methods by CML (University of Leiden) and BUWAL’s ecopoint method.
As with processes, you can create your own methods or edit those supplied. In
this way you can include new substances in calculations, alter their overall
effects, and add additional environmental criteria against which to measure the
product’s impacts.
SimaPro will
check to see if any substances in your model are missing from the selected
evaluation method before it does any calculating. After that, the software will
calculate all available data and present the user with some gloriously colorful
graphs.
The graphical
displays are easy to understand, but if you need to be specific, you can click
the table button to view the precise impact results in tabular form. Either
way, tables and graphs can be exported or pasted to other Windflows
applications for further manipulation.
Clicking the
substances page tab will take you to the inventory, or impact table. This lists
the amounts of all substances included in the calculations under their
respective materials or processes. There are separate tables for raw materials,
airborne, waterborne and solid emissions, emissions to soil and non-material
emissions such as heat and land use.
SimaPro can
also display impact data on a process tree diagram. Here, each element details
the name and amount of the process or box it represents and flows its
contribution to environmental impacts by means of a numerical value and a
vertical bar like a thermometer. The thermometers can display cumulative
impacts for the whole tree, or absolute impacts for each element. They can
represent any of the impact criteria available in the evaluation method used.
Conclusion
Whether you
want to carry out a quick analysis or more detailed LCA calculations, SimaPro
4.0 is a useful aid. In the Windflows environment it is straightforward to use
and has a logical and uniform feel about it. Process data now conforms to a
common standard, rather than to the whims of an individual software producer.
Data, results and graphs can be exported or pasted to other Windflows
applications for presentation or further analysis.
The way it
has been designed, SimaPro is perfectly capable of modelling a full range of
products, from packaging to electronics, but the results will obviously depend
upon the quality of data used. PRé are at pains to stress that the whole LCA methodology
is constantly being updated and changed, and that you will not find a definitive
answer with SimaPro. However, with the range and quality of data provided, and
the flexibility to update and add your own, SimaPro offers a comprehensive tool
for use in LCA calculations. •
Paul
Stockdale is a freelance author and has a background in Wastes Management and
Environmental Technology.
References
Siegenthaler,
C.P., Linder, S. and Pagliari, F., ‘LCA Software Guide 1997’
(
Management,
1997).
|